oakley sunglasses for cheap the parties may often be a juror for the withdrawal request or objectio

As mentioned above, the parties may often be a juror for the withdrawal request or objection, easily lead to miscarriage of justice and the ability and qualifications to serve as jurors, it is easy to incur the opposition of the parties. This picky jurors in subsequent years, the people on the king to punish the jury's behavior increasingly expressed dissatisfaction as well as the formation of the strong against the tide, and finally, after 1670, one case (Bushell's case), requiring jurors should be based on the evidence of independent judgment, not should be held accountable or punished. This also reinforces the color of the judicial of the jury judge.
Difficult for us to give the jury as a witness when completely evolved into as a judge of the jury to draw a absolute boundaries, but it is generally believed that, to the mid-17th century, the characteristics of the judge has been very prominent. About in the late 18th century the jury a thorough evolution for the Judge.
The stability of the jury as the judge
With the characteristics of the administration of justice by jury gradually strengthen and highlight some subtle but qualitative changes in the beginning also the history quietly. The efforts of the British royal family through the centuries, centralization has been basically established, and is often manifested in too autocratic and brutal judicial sometimes became for the King any means to suppress the people, especially in the Tudor dynasty and the Stuart dynasty. we are familiar with Star Palace Court (constellation Court of Justice) is capable of royal dictatorship institutions. However, the other side of history are quietly taking place, that is, the King was becoming increasingly difficult to control of the jury convened by royal officials they trust jurors, for these jurors may harbor eccentric while the opposition party would be subjected to; Initially, the jury is convened by the royal officials, the development trend of now there are elected; can control other evidence, and thus indirectly control the determination of the jury, and now all sorts of evidence naturally raised; made sub-king taste the jury verdict, the king now more and more freely to the jury to be punished. sentence turned out to be an effective tool for the jury of the dictatorship of the King, now appears to be growing out of King's control,mlb jerseys cheap, and because the jury is now an increasingly prominent position as a judicial referee who can actually become the people to protect their own rights and freedoms of a fortress against the King's autocratic, the most famous Throckmorton's Case, 1554 and 1670 the Bushell'sCase the two cases,oakley sunglasses for cheap, the jury is firmly opposed to the autocratic and arrogant of the royal family, agreed to declare the defendant not guilty. In view of this, the royal family on the one hand still stubbornly vain attempt to continue to strengthen on the jury Mission control; the other hand, have abandoned jury do not sign, the infamous sign the court never implemented jury system; Koch (Coke, Sir Edward), Sir also think that felons can not a jury trial and sentenced to death In fact, just as before show that the King never for the promotion of the jury and not the jury the jury, the king, but need to control the administration of justice by a jury, to maintain the rule if conditions permit effective